On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Gary Poster <email address hidden> wrote:
> Stuart, Chex and I tried to QA we were not sure what in production
> actually wants this facility. For instance, on staging, LPCONFIG is set
> when Make is run, it seems, so it is cooked:
> https://pastebin.canonical.com/38749/ .
>
> Can you give us an idea of what to QA?
check that staging and qastaging services all come up properly; done.
I guess 'look at the config the services report that they are using'
(if thats not possible, we've a transparency issue to fix too).
For instance, the librarian issue you encountered might be this patch
breaking its config.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Gary Poster <email address hidden> wrote: /pastebin. canonical. com/38749/ .
> Stuart, Chex and I tried to QA we were not sure what in production
> actually wants this facility. For instance, on staging, LPCONFIG is set
> when Make is run, it seems, so it is cooked:
> https:/
>
> Can you give us an idea of what to QA?
check that staging and qastaging services all come up properly; done.
I guess 'look at the config the services report that they are using'
(if thats not possible, we've a transparency issue to fix too).
For instance, the librarian issue you encountered might be this patch
breaking its config.
-Rob