On Sunday 01 August 2010 21:30:36 you wrote: > I think we should get rid of the sqlobject idioms, as we're building > on storm, not sqlobject.
I agree, and I don't think this is a bug. The real bug is in the code that's using the result set.
On Sunday 01 August 2010 21:30:36 you wrote:
> I think we should get rid of the sqlobject idioms, as we're building
> on storm, not sqlobject.
I agree, and I don't think this is a bug. The real bug is in the code that's
using the result set.