Comment 9 for bug 5786
Revision history for this message
| Björn Tillenius (bjornt) wrote Re: [Bug 5786] NeedsInfo should be moved into a separate bug or bugtask flag | #9 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:53:08AM -0000, Brad Bollenbach wrote:
> Public bug report changed:
> https:/
>
> Comment:
> Why should it be assigned to the designer? What if it were just a simple
> bit of design input required? How do I make sure that I don't lose track
> of ultimately being responsible for fixing the bug?
If it's just a simple bit of design, maybe you could ask him directly?
I'm not totally against having it as a flag, where you can specify from
which person you need input, I'm just questioning if it's worth the
extra complexity.
Anyway. Needing input from a developer is different from needing input
from the reporter. The former probably means that the bug is accepted,
the latter should mean that the bug report lacks information. I think
it's worth keeping these two use cases separated.