On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 09:54 +0000, Julian Edwards wrote:
> On Saturday 27 March 2010 04:42:06 you wrote:
> > Public bug reported:
> >
> > BuildQueue.destroySelf does this:
> >
> > Store.of(specific_job).remove(specific_job)
> >
> > That doesn't work for TranslationsTemplateBuildJobs, which are not
> > themselves Storm objects (their BranchJob is).
> > specific_job.destroySelf() may be better.
>
> Hmm.
>
> We should really be using Storm objects for any new database objects, why is
> TranslationsTemplateBuildJob not so?
There is no TTBJ table -- it is represented by a BranchJob in the DB,
and somehow gets materialised as a TTBJ.
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 09:54 +0000, Julian Edwards wrote: destroySelf does this: specific_ job).remove( specific_ job) plateBuildJobs, which are not job.destroySelf () may be better. plateBuildJob not so?
> On Saturday 27 March 2010 04:42:06 you wrote:
> > Public bug reported:
> >
> > BuildQueue.
> >
> > Store.of(
> >
> > That doesn't work for TranslationsTem
> > themselves Storm objects (their BranchJob is).
> > specific_
>
> Hmm.
>
> We should really be using Storm objects for any new database objects, why is
> TranslationsTem
There is no TTBJ table -- it is represented by a BranchJob in the DB,
and somehow gets materialised as a TTBJ.