On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Graham Binns <email address hidden> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that an IPerson should have a max_heat value; it
> doesn't make sense to have a Person as a heat context.
>
> It would make more sense to me (and wouldn't required a DB patch) to
> have an IHasBugHeat interface which carries the max_heat field.
> IProduct, IDistribution, IDistributionSeries and
> IDistributionSourcePackage(?) would descend from IHasBugHeat; IPerson
> shouldn't.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Graham Binns <email address hidden> wrote: urcePackage( ?) would descend from IHasBugHeat; IPerson
> I'm not convinced that an IPerson should have a max_heat value; it
> doesn't make sense to have a Person as a heat context.
>
> It would make more sense to me (and wouldn't required a DB patch) to
> have an IHasBugHeat interface which carries the max_heat field.
> IProduct, IDistribution, IDistributionSeries and
> IDistributionSo
> shouldn't.
Why descend? Why not adapt?
jml