-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Lange wrote: > Possibly a dupe of bug 325761
I don't think they're similar enough at this point to call them dupes, but a solution for one bug might close both.
Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAktm590ACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI2SNgCfYR2k0BJPZCdgelwjKLJkcESD ePQAn0UH1C7rkvUVn+Hdw8rAO/gDUvGl =cO9a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Lange wrote:
> Possibly a dupe of bug 325761
I don't think they're similar enough at this point to call them dupes,
but a solution for one bug might close both.
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkt m590ACgkQ0F+ nu1YWqI2SNgCfYR 2k0BJPZCdgelwjK LJkcESD Vn+Hdw8rAO/ gDUvGl
ePQAn0UH1C7rkvU
=cO9a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----