On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Aaron Bentley <email address hidden> wrote:
> I don't think the start-up costs of subprocesses are relevant here,
> because we will not be starting new subprocesses for each job. Ampoule
> is a process pool, and we can reuse the subprocesses as many times as we
> like.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Aaron Bentley <email address hidden> wrote:
> I don't think the start-up costs of subprocesses are relevant here,
> because we will not be starting new subprocesses for each job. Ampoule
> is a process pool, and we can reuse the subprocesses as many times as we
> like.
Ahh, I see. That makes much more sense.
jml