Comment 2 for bug 48446

Wow - so there it is...! Now I'm torn between closing this (#48446) bug (as you've shown me how to close it - isn't recursion lovely) and leaving it open (as I still think that making that procedure more obvious would benefit people - I'm certain that it would improve the accuracy of aggregate bug statistics).

I guess I'll close it, but someone may want to stick something appropriate on their "to-do" list.

Many thanks, Jaime :-)