Comment 5 for bug 48070
Revision history for this message
| Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote Re: [Bug 48070] Re: [queue tool] Please accept multiple queue IDs to act on | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:56:22PM -0000, Celso Providelo wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Looks like we have a new suggestion:
> {{{
> (09:46:23) Kamion: it would be quite nice if 'queue' without any non-option arguments would start a queue console, a bit like the python shell
> (09:46:43) Kamion: then you could just type commands at it, without having to worry about what happens if the third-from-last command in your sequence fail
> (09:46:46) Kamion: s
> }}}
>
> I like it and AFAICT the implementation would be much cleaner than the
> former (full of corner cases)
What corner cases? It seems incredibly simple to me; hundreds of other
programs work this way and it makes intuitive sense.
> A Twisted based console (same used already in scripts/
> /buildd-monitor.py) and the current queue.CommandRunner association
> would do a great job with much less code.
Why is any more code required than a for loop?
--
- mdz