We (Roestta developers) have a meeting next Tuesday to talk about the final approach we will follow to fix this problem.
The main idea we have is to 'convert' this kind of .po files to follow the usual gettext plural forms syntax so people will see them as any other .po files with plural forms. On export time, we will 'convert' them again so KDE will still understand them.
This way we don't need to add more than one kind of plural forms support.
We (Roestta developers) have a meeting next Tuesday to talk about the final approach we will follow to fix this problem.
The main idea we have is to 'convert' this kind of .po files to follow the usual gettext plural forms syntax so people will see them as any other .po files with plural forms. On export time, we will 'convert' them again so KDE will still understand them.
This way we don't need to add more than one kind of plural forms support.