Martin Pool wrote:
> Agree about copying them, disagree about copying the approvals - but showing
> "previously approved" would be good.
My reasoning was that people who have approved a proposal already are
unlikely to want to re-review it. In the rare case where a resubmission
changes a person's vote from approved to something else, they still have
the option of voting again. But if they do nothing, then their previous
approval will apply to the new version.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin Pool wrote:
> Agree about copying them, disagree about copying the approvals - but showing
> "previously approved" would be good.
My reasoning was that people who have approved a proposal already are
unlikely to want to re-review it. In the rare case where a resubmission
changes a person's vote from approved to something else, they still have
the option of voting again. But if they do nothing, then their previous
approval will apply to the new version.
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkp fJtUACgkQ0F+ nu1YWqI0b3wCfYG fvEKUKNDcoVLlJm VU41Hb9 cLpj02vg7UTX9Iq yt
qJgAn3Vgi2zIb4E
=nwT0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----