On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 04:03 +0000, Tim Penhey wrote:
> Now we could have an ubuntu packaging branch
>
> ~eric-the-viking/ubuntu/karmic/fooix/packaging
>
> and a debian packaging branch
>
> ~eric-the-viking/debian/squeeze/fooix/packaging
The only problems with these is it needs to be per series. So if I had
an unstable an a stable series both with packaging branches. So it'd
have to be something like:
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 04:03 +0000, Tim Penhey wrote: viking/ ubuntu/ karmic/ fooix/packaging viking/ debian/ squeeze/ fooix/packaging
> Now we could have an ubuntu packaging branch
>
> ~eric-the-
>
> and a debian packaging branch
>
> ~eric-the-
The only problems with these is it needs to be per series. So if I had
an unstable an a stable series both with packaging branches. So it'd
have to be something like:
~eric- the-viking/ ubuntu/ karmic/ fooix/stable/ packaging the-viking/ debian/ squeeze/ fooix/stable/ packaging
~eric-
~eric- the-viking/ ubuntu/ karmic/ fooix/unstable/ packaging the-viking/ debian/ squeeze/ fooix/unstable/ packaging
~eric-
I guess if it's a series we don't need the username though.
--Ted