default sort order on person's bugs page is useless
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Launchpad itself |
Triaged
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
At the moment the person bugs page (eg https:/
The net result is that my bugs default page shows above the fold almost entirely bugs that are upstream and being ignored by upstream, and that are relatively unimportant to me. The bugs I care strongly about or can work on are much further down.
I have "most recently changed" bookmarked to go to this page and I find that's much more likely to put interesting bugs at the top. It implicitly includes bugs that I just filed. Could we change the default to be that?
Doing this would mostly fix bug 391765.
Changed in malone: | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
description: | updated |
Hm, interesting idea. The rationale for sorting by importance was that it would be more useful for actual developers -- the top reports would be the ones they'd need to work on next. But as you say, it's not so relevant for reporters or subscribers.
So perhaps the +assignedbugs list should be sorted by importance by default, while all the other person bugs lists are sorted most-recently- changed first as you suggest.