Sorry for not being clear, Barry. I meant that the full aggregation described in comment 5 (the LMTP server and even the cronjob-y bits that would be part of the bounce "service") might be of value to them, not just flufl.bounce.
Sorry for not being clear, Barry. I meant that the full aggregation described in comment 5 (the LMTP server and even the cronjob-y bits that would be part of the bounce "service") might be of value to them, not just flufl.bounce.