On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 07:33:23PM -0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> I've created:
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/packages-arch-specific/sid (bzr mirror of your git branch)
> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/packages-arch-specific/ubuntu
>
> Currently these two are identical, and I don't have a problem with them
> remaining so if at all possible - we'll be happy to file bugs for
> updates - but of course we'd like to control our own infrastructure.
> Putting it in bzr makes it trivial to grant access to the ubuntu-core-
> dev team.
but please communicate clearly that bug reports are still expected,
even if more could access it directly now.
I would be very unhappy to discover that there were silent changes to the
Ubuntu branch which just aswell apply to Debian. And of course you also
get work if the patch is applied in Debian but with, say, different
whitespace settings. (The file is sadly not coherent in that regard.)
Colin,
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 07:33:23PM -0000, Colin Watson wrote: /code.launchpad .net/~cjwatson/ packages- arch-specific/ sid (bzr mirror of your git branch) /code.launchpad .net/~ubuntu- core-dev/ packages- arch-specific/ ubuntu
> I've created:
>
> https:/
> https:/
>
> Currently these two are identical, and I don't have a problem with them
> remaining so if at all possible - we'll be happy to file bugs for
> updates - but of course we'd like to control our own infrastructure.
> Putting it in bzr makes it trivial to grant access to the ubuntu-core-
> dev team.
but please communicate clearly that bug reports are still expected,
even if more could access it directly now.
I would be very unhappy to discover that there were silent changes to the
Ubuntu branch which just aswell apply to Debian. And of course you also
get work if the patch is applied in Debian but with, say, different
whitespace settings. (The file is sadly not coherent in that regard.)
Is the ubuntu-core-dev branch autosynced?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern