As for the latter note, I somewhat agree it is a bit confusing. The concept of tasks however fits well with that text -- a task is really a request to fix the bug in a certain context. The bug itself is just a report, and an alternative to avoid this confusion would be allowing people to file bug reports and enter as much information as they knew -- omitting distribution/release/etc if they didn't know at the moment of the report. Of course, you could argue that would result in a reduced number of useful bug reports.
Perhaps the best solution is just renaming to say "Indicate bug also occurs in a distribution". What do you think?
I'm looking into your report.
As for the latter note, I somewhat agree it is a bit confusing. The concept of tasks however fits well with that text -- a task is really a request to fix the bug in a certain context. The bug itself is just a report, and an alternative to avoid this confusion would be allowing people to file bug reports and enter as much information as they knew -- omitting distribution/ release/ etc if they didn't know at the moment of the report. Of course, you could argue that would result in a reduced number of useful bug reports.
Perhaps the best solution is just renaming to say "Indicate bug also occurs in a distribution". What do you think?