> The bug in question was bug #267611. None of us were able to reproduce
> it, so it was quite unamusing when it persisted, changed nature, and was
> still unreproducable. When I finally got a developer to reproduce it,
> the only difference I could see was the arch. I went through all of the
> people on the bug that it affected, and their recent Intrepid HWDB
> submissions were either amd64 or on hardware that others ran amd64 on.
brilliant idea! That's one thing more to remember for the HWDB -- it
should not be necessray to collect this data manually as you had to do.
William,
> The bug in question was bug #267611. None of us were able to reproduce
> it, so it was quite unamusing when it persisted, changed nature, and was
> still unreproducable. When I finally got a developer to reproduce it,
> the only difference I could see was the arch. I went through all of the
> people on the bug that it affected, and their recent Intrepid HWDB
> submissions were either amd64 or on hardware that others ran amd64 on.
brilliant idea! That's one thing more to remember for the HWDB -- it
should not be necessray to collect this data manually as you had to do.