On 11.10.2008 12:34, William Grant wrote:
> I used the HWDB submissions today to track down an elusive arch-specific
> bug. Having them easily accessible would make things somewhat
> easier, but it's still mighty useful!
>
That's really interesting -- I'd thought that the current ways to access
the submissions would not allow this. You're making me quite curious
(and hearing about current use cases gives me also ideas what should be
done to improve the HWDB): How did you find the interesting submissions,
and which data did you use?
On 11.10.2008 12:34, William Grant wrote:
> I used the HWDB submissions today to track down an elusive arch-specific
> bug. Having them easily accessible would make things somewhat
> easier, but it's still mighty useful!
>
That's really interesting -- I'd thought that the current ways to access
the submissions would not allow this. You're making me quite curious
(and hearing about current use cases gives me also ideas what should be
done to improve the HWDB): How did you find the interesting submissions,
and which data did you use?