Yep, I agree that the wording and spacing of the text in ppas-in-packages.png is much clearer.
I wonder if your main concern - too much emphasis - would be addressed by the suggested collapsing of the information by default (so it requires a click to display it)? And if you can think of any other ways we could indicate visually that it is supplementary info, let me know!
And yes, I agree that the side would be the most appropriate place for this information, but when we discussed it previously we could not find a way to present it with such a limited width. It's seems necessary to include the name of the PPA, the owner and the versions... which is very difficult in the sidebar.
Thanks for the feedback Michael.
Yep, I agree that the wording and spacing of the text in ppas-in- packages. png is much clearer.
I wonder if your main concern - too much emphasis - would be addressed by the suggested collapsing of the information by default (so it requires a click to display it)? And if you can think of any other ways we could indicate visually that it is supplementary info, let me know!
And yes, I agree that the side would be the most appropriate place for this information, but when we discussed it previously we could not find a way to present it with such a limited width. It's seems necessary to include the name of the PPA, the owner and the versions... which is very difficult in the sidebar.