Michael, you're right, I should have looked at my own example! "PPAs for fast-user-switch-applet" would be completely lost at the bottom of <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fast-user-switch-applet>. Probably the version history should be a table where each row is collapsed by default, but for a package with a long history like this one, even that wouldn't help much.
Maybe we can alleviate the order problem with more precise headings:
= “fast-user-switch-applet” source package in Ubuntu =
== Versions published in Ubuntu series ==
...
== Untrusted versions in PPAs ==
...
== History of versions published in Ubuntu ==
...
Anything more than that is probably veering into major redesign territory. (Perhaps the "Published versions", "Version history", and "Source package publishing history" tables should be combined into a single expandable table...)
Michael, you're right, I should have looked at my own example! "PPAs for fast-user- switch- applet" would be completely lost at the bottom of <https:/ /launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ fast-user- switch- applet>. Probably the version history should be a table where each row is collapsed by default, but for a package with a long history like this one, even that wouldn't help much.
Maybe we can alleviate the order problem with more precise headings:
= “fast-user- switch- applet” source package in Ubuntu =
== Versions published in Ubuntu series ==
...
== Untrusted versions in PPAs ==
...
== History of versions published in Ubuntu ==
...
Anything more than that is probably veering into major redesign territory. (Perhaps the "Published versions", "Version history", and "Source package publishing history" tables should be combined into a single expandable table...)