On Friday 26 June 2009 16:25:05 Michael Nelson wrote:
> (IMO, I do find the table version easier to read, but it seems then to
> be more important information on the page - ie. similar to the table
> above it... so I'm undecided :) ).
That's exactly my concern as well.
However, I feel that this extra information is less important than the
official Ubuntu package so while it should be very readable, it should not
dominate the page.
On Friday 26 June 2009 16:25:05 Michael Nelson wrote:
> (IMO, I do find the table version easier to read, but it seems then to
> be more important information on the page - ie. similar to the table
> above it... so I'm undecided :) ).
That's exactly my concern as well.
However, I feel that this extra information is less important than the
official Ubuntu package so while it should be very readable, it should not
dominate the page.