On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Christian Reis <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:17:04PM -0000, Martin Albisetti wrote:
>> - Remove the bugtracker column
>> - Remove the upstream contact column
>
> By removing these, we lose the only view which allows us to verify how
> good our coverage in these aspects is of the most important packages. Is
> the issue real estate? Might be smarter to find a way to condense that
> information.
This is actually the result of a conversation with Jorge, who thought
those could be removed (ie, they weren't important).
If they are, we can maybe use a tick or cross to show if the upstream
contact is available?
I agree we can condense it better, I just need to know what the
purpose of this page is :)
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Christian Reis <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:17:04PM -0000, Martin Albisetti wrote:
>> - Remove the bugtracker column
>> - Remove the upstream contact column
>
> By removing these, we lose the only view which allows us to verify how
> good our coverage in these aspects is of the most important packages. Is
> the issue real estate? Might be smarter to find a way to condense that
> information.
This is actually the result of a conversation with Jorge, who thought
those could be removed (ie, they weren't important).
If they are, we can maybe use a tick or cross to show if the upstream
contact is available?
I agree we can condense it better, I just need to know what the
purpose of this page is :)
--
Martin