Comment 4 for bug 161822

Revision history for this message
John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote : Re: [Bug 161822] Re: new bugs by email requires gpg signature but does not strip it from bug report

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Micah Gersten wrote:
> Don't know if you want to change the subject, but this also occurs when
> replying to bugs as well as creating new ones.
>

Well, replies aren't *required* to have them like new bug postings are,
so it is slightly different.

I'm fine with it hiding/stripping gpg signatures on replies. The
original concern was that

1) In order to request a new bug *at all* you had to use a gpg signature
2) The signatures were not stripped from the request email

thus

3) You always had a gpg signature on the description for any bug that
was reported by email.

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkpnHXAACgkQJdeBCYSNAAOiugCeIznaTO0K/8HNIfzcVEO17qsz
rJ0AnA0mLKjO5B8YZ+hsXV4EiGAEAKqn
=IP3h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----