Christian Reis wrote:
> If it's because of the width of the table we could replace the
> distroseries status with the package component; on a package level, the
> component is definitely a lot more useful than the status of the series.
>
I'd prefer to keep the series status, since it determines the relative
importance of updates to the package. The component is available in the
detailed publishing history.
Christian Reis wrote:
> If it's because of the width of the table we could replace the
> distroseries status with the package component; on a package level, the
> component is definitely a lot more useful than the status of the series.
>
I'd prefer to keep the series status, since it determines the relative
importance of updates to the package. The component is available in the
detailed publishing history.
Mark