On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:53:00AM -0000, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> I think your #4 would make the effect of undoing a duplicate marking
> either surprising (if it returned apparently-removed assignees to their
> positions) or lossy (if it didn't). As for whether any of the data in a
I think that's only very slightly annoying, and it's the least of all
annoyances posted to this bug so far. I'd be happy to entertain another
less annoying proposal, but doing #4 allows us to hide the task table
completely, which is the thing which makes the most sense for a
duplicate bug.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:53:00AM -0000, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> I think your #4 would make the effect of undoing a duplicate marking
> either surprising (if it returned apparently-removed assignees to their
> positions) or lossy (if it didn't). As for whether any of the data in a
I think that's only very slightly annoying, and it's the least of all
annoyances posted to this bug so far. I'd be happy to entertain another
less annoying proposal, but doing #4 allows us to hide the task table
completely, which is the thing which makes the most sense for a
duplicate bug.