Blueprints have been spammed for something like the last seven or eight years, sadly, not just the past year. It's a very long time since looking through the blueprint list was a remotely helpful indicator of developer activity; and most of the blueprints filed by casual users never get any attention, since they have been misled into thinking that filing a blueprint is a useful way to make a feature request, rather than a mechanism for developers to plan, coordinate, and record non-trivial feature development work.
I think it'd be reasonable to use the members slot for this. Really, blueprints are a tool for developer coordination, but it's quite common for them to be registered by people in management positions and I think the developer slots would be a bit too restrictive in practice. The bar for membership should be low enough that anyone who's really involved shouldn't have a problem, while it would steer casual users to more constructive avenues for feature requests.
Blueprints have been spammed for something like the last seven or eight years, sadly, not just the past year. It's a very long time since looking through the blueprint list was a remotely helpful indicator of developer activity; and most of the blueprints filed by casual users never get any attention, since they have been misled into thinking that filing a blueprint is a useful way to make a feature request, rather than a mechanism for developers to plan, coordinate, and record non-trivial feature development work.
I think it'd be reasonable to use the members slot for this. Really, blueprints are a tool for developer coordination, but it's quite common for them to be registered by people in management positions and I think the developer slots would be a bit too restrictive in practice. The bar for membership should be low enough that anyone who's really involved shouldn't have a problem, while it would steer casual users to more constructive avenues for feature requests.