Comment 2 for bug 1034

A couple of comments and questions here:

  - You say "the part after the @ is irrelevant" but you actually mean that "the part after the @ stays constant".

  - You could argue that each bug /should/ be accepted individually, since it may represent something which is on or off-topic for a list.

  - Does GNU Mailman allow whitelisting email regexes?

  - The trivial solution is having a single sender address (<email address hidden>). Doesn't that create its own set of serious problems?

  - Debbugs has the same problem, doesn't it?