A couple of comments and questions here:
- You say "the part after the @ is irrelevant" but you actually mean that "the part after the @ stays constant".
- You could argue that each bug /should/ be accepted individually, since it may represent something which is on or off-topic for a list.
- Does GNU Mailman allow whitelisting email regexes?
- The trivial solution is having a single sender address (<email address hidden>). Doesn't that create its own set of serious problems?
- Debbugs has the same problem, doesn't it?
A couple of comments and questions here:
- You say "the part after the @ is irrelevant" but you actually mean that "the part after the @ stays constant".
- You could argue that each bug /should/ be accepted individually, since it may represent something which is on or off-topic for a list.
- Does GNU Mailman allow whitelisting email regexes?
- The trivial solution is having a single sender address (<email address hidden>). Doesn't that create its own set of serious problems?
- Debbugs has the same problem, doesn't it?