In this case "thin" was an engineering term: they have no width so they're drawn at 1 pixel no matter the scale.
It does sound like the "hot zone" around "thin" *is* getting scaled with the zoom, which is incorrect. That could be fixed.
(But yes, to answer the other question, we got lots of feedback on people not liking the disambiguation menu coming up in various circumstances. We've also allowed selecting of the interior of zones -- when shown filled -- to address user feedback.)
In this case "thin" was an engineering term: they have no width so they're drawn at 1 pixel no matter the scale.
It does sound like the "hot zone" around "thin" *is* getting scaled with the zoom, which is incorrect. That could be fixed.
(But yes, to answer the other question, we got lots of feedback on people not liking the disambiguation menu coming up in various circumstances. We've also allowed selecting of the interior of zones -- when shown filled -- to address user feedback.)