On 14/03/18 18:17, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> We really need to come up with a better plan forward for v6. The idea
> that we are only going to support x86 and x86_64 is short sighted with
> the ever increasing power and availability of arm and arm 64 platforms.
>
Hi Wayne,
I tested libcontext on x86, x86_64, ARM and ARM64. Maybe someone changed
some compiler flags for ARM targets so that it doesn't build anymore - I
have no idea for the moment.
The bug report is mostly (as the title suggests) about supporting
PowerPC and MIPS. I don't think we have any developer who has a MIPS/PPC
machine. Supporting exotic or prehistoric platforms is IMHO very outside
of our business of making EDA software.
On 14/03/18 18:17, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> We really need to come up with a better plan forward for v6. The idea
> that we are only going to support x86 and x86_64 is short sighted with
> the ever increasing power and availability of arm and arm 64 platforms.
>
Hi Wayne,
I tested libcontext on x86, x86_64, ARM and ARM64. Maybe someone changed
some compiler flags for ARM targets so that it doesn't build anymore - I
have no idea for the moment.
The bug report is mostly (as the title suggests) about supporting
PowerPC and MIPS. I don't think we have any developer who has a MIPS/PPC
machine. Supporting exotic or prehistoric platforms is IMHO very outside
of our business of making EDA software.
Tom