On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 09:18:50AM -0000, Artsiom Shchatsko wrote:
> But someone may just wish to implement ODB++ for his/her needs (the more output formats is supported the better) so I think it's OK to keep it in the wishlist.
Wouldn't be a license issue since it requires some kind of
registration/NDA? It would need to be provided as a binary blob (like
proprietary video drivers) which many linking issue (like proprietary
video drivers!)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 09:18:50AM -0000, Artsiom Shchatsko wrote:
> But someone may just wish to implement ODB++ for his/her needs (the more output formats is supported the better) so I think it's OK to keep it in the wishlist.
Wouldn't be a license issue since it requires some kind of
registration/NDA? It would need to be provided as a binary blob (like
proprietary video drivers) which many linking issue (like proprietary
video drivers!)
--
Lorenzo Marcantonio
CZ Srl - Parma