Comment 50 for bug 1385816

Revision history for this message
deme (demestav) wrote :

Nick, maybe I confused you with the way I wrote comment #32 (unless I am missing something). I wrote it like this to show the sequence of my tests. If I rearrange:

4760 - works
4790 - works
4806 - works
4807 - error
4820 - error
4920 - error
5095 - error
5147 - error

So it seems that the problem is introduced in 4807.