@Adam: if I understand you correctly, we should not consider this a vulnerability, but this being designed behavior. This was my original thought, but Dolph's comments made me reconsider.
@Dolph: do you confirm Adam's point of view ? If yes, I'd just close this as Invalid.
@Adam: if I understand you correctly, we should not consider this a vulnerability, but this being designed behavior. This was my original thought, but Dolph's comments made me reconsider.
@Dolph: do you confirm Adam's point of view ? If yes, I'd just close this as Invalid.