Comment 1 for bug 843153

We allow users without tenants. That was based on the conversation we had that you did not want to have to create a dummy tenant to park global users in. So creating a user without a tenant is supported, so it isn't a bad request. However, there obviously is a bug somewhere that maybe is not validating that the caller has the right to create a global user (a user without a tenant). I can add that test case...