For this issue, -1 makes sense. That's a commonly used value to "disable" a setting, or in this case make it "unbound". The enforcement model might need to be a separate issue, that is a good point, we should likely be making sure a child can't be "unbound" when its parent is bound to a limit.
For this issue, -1 makes sense. That's a commonly used value to "disable" a setting, or in this case make it "unbound". The enforcement model might need to be a separate issue, that is a good point, we should likely be making sure a child can't be "unbound" when its parent is bound to a limit.