Comment 1 for bug 1987750

Revision history for this message
Khaled El Mously (kmously) wrote :

This is a 0829 kernel that was cranked in the middle of the *0919* cycle so it was already very late, and only after more than a week later after all testing had finished did I notice that it is based on the 0919 Jammy base (5.15.0-49.55) not the 0829 Jammy base. At that point it is easier to discard it and just crank 0919.