Comment 42 for bug 643146

Shame.

I feel like I shouldn't have bothered starting this thread. The main point was to brainstorm for the benefit of the creator, many hands make light work and all that. The main points discovered generally, that would extend into any area of logo design, were that the icon should be simple, yet iconic, enough to fit a mono tray icon but should also represent the actual program.
Unfortunately, just about the first idea everyone had was a film cell. Then it was soon realised that it's been done a thousand times and is more suited to Pitivi or the such. Honest criticisms? What's with the wand? Kazam isn't some kind of magic solution. The icon makes me think this program fixes broken .avi files. Sure it was nice having something designed for you specifically, but at what cost? Wasn't it just worth sticking with the borrowed one? Seems like good looks won out over other sensibilities.