Comment 37 for bug 1765393

Revision history for this message
Filip Chmielewski (iridiumoxide) wrote : Re: Question related to review https://review.opencontrail.org/#/c/43079/1

Hi,

FQN for all objects is defined as [parent's FQN] + [own name].
All children of config-root (such as Domain) have FQNs that are simply
1-element arrays containing their name, which suggests that config-root's
FQN should be an empty list.

For example, in a hierarchy of Config Root -> Domain -> Project -> Network
Policy, we have:
Network Policy's FQN = [domain-name, project-name, policy-name]
Project's FQN = [domain-name, project-name]
Domain's FQN = [domain-name]
so Config Root's FQN should be [] .

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Sachchidanand Vaidya <email address hidden>
wrote:

> +Filip
>
>
>
> *From: *Ram Yadav <email address hidden>
> *Date: *Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 11:45 AM
> *To: *Daniel Jasiński <email address hidden>
> *Cc: *Sachchidanand Vaidya <email address hidden>
> *Subject: *Question related to review https://review.opencontrail.
> org/#/c/43079/1
>
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Can you explain the rationale for returning empty ArrayList as FQN for
> config-root?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ram
>

--

-------------------------------
The information in this email is
confidential and may be legally privileged, it may contain information that
is confidential in CodiLime Sp. z o. o. It is intended solely for the
addressee. Any access to this email by third parties is unauthorized. If
you are not the intended recipient of this message, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action undertaken or neglected in reliance
thereon is prohibited and may result in your liability for damages.