Comment 14 for bug 1653479

Revision history for this message
Manish Singh (manishs) wrote :

Second time when same issue was reported, Level1 forwarder(@172.23.0.61) does not have label allocated for 172.23.0.63. Though in 172.23.0.63 there is a label present.
Peering is also present among Control-nodes.

Control-node team is looking in the issue.

trees
group
source
level0_forwarders
level1_forwarders
255.255.255.255
0.0.0.0
level0_forwarders
level1_forwarders
address
label_block
label
router_id
links
address
label_block
label
router_id
links
172.23.0.71
7809-11519
8760
0.0.0.0
links
172.23.0.71
8760-8760
8760
172.23.0.61
links

172.23.0.72
4500-4500
0
172.23.0.63
links

more

trees
group
source
level0_forwarders
255.255.255.255
0.0.0.0
level0_forwarders
address
label_block
label
172.23.0.72
4098-7808
4500