I'm still thinking that --especially given the siginificance that we are giving to the usage of labels-- there should be a lot more explicit/intuitive way to access secrets by the "primary" (i.e. owner's) label.
Once we're encouraged to rely on this single piece of information in our charms as an identifier -- would be a lot more elegant to have better-established means of command-line access than 'grep'-ing.
I'm still thinking that --especially given the siginificance that we are giving to the usage of labels-- there should be a lot more explicit/intuitive way to access secrets by the "primary" (i.e. owner's) label.
Once we're encouraged to rely on this single piece of information in our charms as an identifier -- would be a lot more elegant to have better-established means of command-line access than 'grep'-ing.
Based on the continued discussion (https:/ /chat.charmhub. io/charmhub/ pl/jddb4wtoepd1 pk8f1uguykjyor) it seems like I'm not the only one who thinks there may be value in a dedicated direct access...