Canonical Juju

  1. Bug #2016868
  2. Comment #6

Comment 6 for bug 2016868

Revision history for this message
Ian Booth (wallyworld) wrote :

And no problems when I tried with 3.2

If the failure can be reproduced, we'll need to do so with relevant logged ramped up

"juju.replicaset=TRACE;juju.worker.peergrouper=TRACE"