Comment 5 for bug 1891223

Revision history for this message
Jason Hobbs (jason-hobbs) wrote : Re: [Bug 1891223] Re: deploying openstack on top of focal results in failures due to bumping up against the maxkeys limit

It's not a single charm. We deploy many charms to a system. Some are in
containers. How are charms in containers going to influence system wide
sysctl limits?

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM Tim Penhey <email address hidden>
wrote:

> This makes much more sense being a charm issue, not a Juju issue.
>
> It is charms that should make sure the host is sufficiently configured.
> There is no way that Juju could make reasonable decisions that work for all
> deployments.
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:10 AM Jason Hobbs <email address hidden>
> wrote:
>
> > You could probably also reproduce it by artificially lowering the
> > maxkeys limit on a system and then deploying lots of containers to it.
> >
> > --
> > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> > Matching subscriptions: Juju bugs
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891223
> >
> > Title:
> > deploying openstack on top of focal results in failures due to bumping
> > up against the maxkeys limit
> >
> > To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1891223/+subscriptions
> >
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891223
>
> Title:
> deploying openstack on top of focal results in failures due to bumping
> up against the maxkeys limit
>
> Status in juju:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Forked from bug 1839616.
>
> Deploying PCB (Ussuri) on top of focal results in sporadic failures
> due to running up against the kernel.keys.maxkeys limit. This limit is
> discussed here:
>
> https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/docs/master/production-setup
>
> Normally, a system administrator would adjust this limit based on the
> workload. In this case, juju owns the system and it should be
> responsible for adjusting this limit.
>
> Juju users can workaround this by providing cloud-init userdata that
> adjusts the sysctl limit.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1891223/+subscriptions
>