This makes much more sense being a charm issue, not a Juju issue.
It is charms that should make sure the host is sufficiently configured.
There is no way that Juju could make reasonable decisions that work for all
deployments.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:10 AM Jason Hobbs <email address hidden>
wrote:
> You could probably also reproduce it by artificially lowering the
> maxkeys limit on a system and then deploying lots of containers to it.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> Matching subscriptions: Juju bugs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891223
>
> Title:
> deploying openstack on top of focal results in failures due to bumping
> up against the maxkeys limit
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1891223/+subscriptions
>
This makes much more sense being a charm issue, not a Juju issue.
It is charms that should make sure the host is sufficiently configured.
There is no way that Juju could make reasonable decisions that work for all
deployments.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:10 AM Jason Hobbs <email address hidden>
wrote:
> You could probably also reproduce it by artificially lowering the /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1891223 /bugs.launchpad .net/juju/ +bug/1891223/ +subscriptions
> maxkeys limit on a system and then deploying lots of containers to it.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> Matching subscriptions: Juju bugs
> https:/
>
> Title:
> deploying openstack on top of focal results in failures due to bumping
> up against the maxkeys limit
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>