Comment 3 for bug 1842358

I'd also say the format of the diff output is going to be different. So if
you are used to looking at the output you'd prefer to see it in the same
way.

I don't know that it is high priority but it does seem useful.

John
=:->

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019, 05:15 Andrea Ieri <email address hidden> wrote:

> I do agree that many cases can already be handled by doing simple text
> comparisons, but I still think this would be worthwhile because whereas
> a diff tool can only compare the syntax of two yaml files, only juju can
> compare semantics.
>
> Some useful benefits of diff-bundle, off the top of my head:
> * ordering doesn't matter
> * yaml anchors
> * file includes
>
> Besides, if we determined that running vimdiff or meld on bundle files
> is already enough, why have `juju diff-bundle` in the first place? After
> all, any model can be exported to a yaml file... ;)
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Status: Incomplete => New
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> Matching subscriptions: juju bugs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842358
>
> Title:
> [RFE] run diff-bundle against two exported bundles
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1842358/+subscriptions
>