Canonical Juju

  1. Bug #1796148
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 1796148

Revision history for this message
Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote : Re: [Bug 1796148] Re: Client loses information about current model

Hey Paul,

I'm pretty sure that the shift to incomplete was to ask for what
commands had been run. What is the likelihood of someone inadvertently
calling 'juju switch'?

Is the information being lost as part of an automated process?

Tim

On 17/10/18 13:10, Paul Gear wrote:
> ** Changed in: juju
> Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
>