Canonical Juju

  1. Bug #1789211
  2. Comment #3

Comment 3 for bug 1789211

Revision history for this message
Felipe Reyes (freyes) wrote : Re: [Bug 1789211] Re: Can't close/open ports without external network

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:56:39PM -0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> Just to clarify, did someone try to "juju expose" an application without
> an external network being defined? Maybe it was part of the bundle
> definition that a given application was supposed to be exposed?

They are running CDK https://jujucharms.com/canonical-kubernetes/ , from the readme:

"This bundle exposes the kubeapi-load-balancer and kubernetes-worker charms by
default, so they are accessible through their public addresses."