On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:56:39PM -0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> Just to clarify, did someone try to "juju expose" an application without
> an external network being defined? Maybe it was part of the bundle
> definition that a given application was supposed to be exposed?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:56:39PM -0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> Just to clarify, did someone try to "juju expose" an application without
> an external network being defined? Maybe it was part of the bundle
> definition that a given application was supposed to be exposed?
They are running CDK https:/ /jujucharms. com/canonical- kubernetes/ , from the readme:
"This bundle exposes the kubeapi- load-balancer and kubernetes-worker charms by
default, so they are accessible through their public addresses."