Comment 1 for bug 1786258

Revision history for this message
John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote : Re: [Bug 1786258] Re: juju should pool connections to mongo

We do pool connections. If the pool is in active use, we allow it to grow.
Likely lots of agents were doing concurrent activity and we don't put hard
caps on the pool.

Likely we *should* be putting a cap on the pool, though it means we'll also
have to handle when a thread is unable to make their request because they
can't get a slot in the pool.

It may just be a limiter/timeout sort of system (wait up to 50ms for a free
slot to be available before creating a new connection).

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:17 AM, Tim Penhey <email address hidden>
wrote:

> ** Tags added: mongodb scalability
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Status: New => Triaged
>
> ** Changed in: juju
> Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> Matching subscriptions: juju bugs
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786258
>
> Title:
> juju should pool connections to mongo
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1786258/+subscriptions
>