juju deploy should do some sanity checking of charms
Bug #1779337 reported by
James Troup
This bug affects 2 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical Juju |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Anastasia | ||
| 2.3 |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Anastasia | ||
| 2.4 |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Anastasia | ||
Bug Description
If you try to deploy an unbuilt reactive charm, juju deploy won't stop you or warn you that anything is wrong.
This is a mistake I think everyone working with reactive charms makes at least once and it seems like it'd be easy for Juju to help the user out. For example, if it's asked to deploy a charm with no hooks directory at all, it should probably say something about that in the logs.
| Changed in juju: | |
| milestone: | none → 2.4.1 |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
Revision history for this message
| Haw Loeung (hloeung) wrote | #1 |
| tags: | added: deploy papercut usability |
| Changed in juju: | |
| milestone: | 2.4.1 → 2.4.2 |
| Changed in juju: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) |
| Changed in juju: | |
| assignee: | Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) → nobody |
| Changed in juju: | |
| milestone: | 2.4.2 → 2.5-beta1 |
Revision history for this message
| Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote | #2 |
Revision history for this message
| Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote | #3 |
Revision history for this message
| Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote | #4 |
| Changed in juju: | |
| status: | Triaged → In Progress |
| assignee: | nobody → Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) |
Revision history for this message
| Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) wrote | #5 |
| Changed in juju: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in juju: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
There's also a related bug filed against the charm store to reject charms pushed without hooks - https:/