Comment 1 for bug 1762069
Revision history for this message
| John A Meinel (jameinel) wrote Re: [Bug 1762069] [NEW] charms should be able to expose version information about themselves (e.g. in juju status) | #1 |
They currently do have a way to expose payload versions (I'm running
"postgres 9.1.2" for xenial/
Is that sufficient, or is that confusing the "version of the charm" with
the "version of the payload". Given your comment about "Openstack Charm"
what are you looking to expose "I would support Mitaka if you wanted it,
even though you're only running Liberty".
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:02 AM, James Troup <email address hidden>
wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Charms should be able to expose version information about themselves to
> users. This would trivially allow one to know what version of the
> OpenStack charms one is using for example.
>
> (I know there's a 'charm' and 'charm-rev' field already in juju status
> but these aren't helpful in identifying the version of the charms.)
>
> ** Affects: juju
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju.
> Matching subscriptions: juju bugs
> https:/
>
> Title:
> charms should be able to expose version information about themselves
> (e.g. in juju status)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>