Comment 3 for bug 1698703

Revision history for this message
Menno Finlay-Smits (menno.smits) wrote :

> Sounds like a time bomb of someone just waiting to update
> something and use a test as a starting point / finding a
> function that sounds like it does just what they want.

For sure - I will put up a fix shortly. I dropped the priority to highlight it's not as critical as some of the other ForModel misuses (and not important for 2.2.1).