Canonical Juju

  1. Bug #1682411
  2. Comment #31

Comment 31 for bug 1682411

Revision history for this message
Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) wrote :

I believe that should work:

- I don't see any caveats about renaming Unix domain sockets in rename(2)
- A quick test with socat UNIX-LISTEN:foo - paired with socat - UNIX-CONNECT:foo wasn't interrupted when renaming the socket 'foo'.

The source directory and the target directory should be on the same filesystem.

Thanks